Law Firm: AI-Powered Document Processing
20+ hours weekly spent manually reviewing legal documents. AI-driven intake, classification, and export to DMS.
- 70% faster processing
- 95% fewer classification errors
We help growing businesses decide where AI belongs, which tools to buy, configure, or build, what rules cover data and human review, and how to get the team actually using it. Model-neutral advice first. Staged implementation when you are ready.
The wish list is the low-friction first step. The $99 consultation is a separate, paid, 1-hour live session, priced apart from any assessment, build, or support plan.
Once AI belongs in a workflow, three routes come up most often. Each has its own page. If you are not sure which fits, start here: we compare them against your data rules, team, and budget, and sometimes the answer is a different tool or none.
Claude for team knowledge work: shared projects, connectors, and Claude Code for engineering.
Best when you have chosen Claude or want to test it against the others.
Claude implementation →A ChatGPT business workspace for staff, or the OpenAI API for applications, integrations, and agents. Billed separately by OpenAI.
Best when your team already uses ChatGPT or a workflow needs OpenAI models inside it.
OpenAI implementation →A company-controlled chat interface (Open WebUI or LibreChat) connected through the Requesty AI gateway to the models you select.
Best when you want one governed workspace with your own access, logging, and spend controls. EU gateway and DPA options are subject to contract and scope checks.
Private AI infrastructure →Deliverables depend on scope. These are the building blocks we assemble into an assessment or a rollout plan.
Your workflows ranked by effort, risk, and value, each with an owner and a recommended path: buy, configure, or build.
A shortlist compared against your stack, data rules, and budget. We are model-neutral: general-purpose assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Gemini are all on the table, and so are a private chat interface on your own hosting and not buying anything.
Draft acceptable-use rules, a data-handling matrix, review checkpoints, and provider-settings checklist. Details in the governance section below.
One workflow, one owner, agreed success measures, a review cadence, and the conditions under which you stop.
Role-based sessions and short SOPs built around your own workflows and documents, not generic prompt tips.
Which systems to connect, what access each connection needs, and how errors and exceptions get handled.
Most AI projects fail on this choice, not on the technology. We make it explicit for every workflow.
Choose it when:A mainstream tool already does the job and your data rules allow it.
What we do:Compare options, check settings against your rules, help with rollout and training. No build work.
Choose it when:A tool is close, but needs your documents, instructions, workflows, or connections to be useful.
What we do:Shared projects and instructions, connectors, automation platforms, and light integration.
Choose it when:Tools fall short: unusual workflow, strict review steps, your own system of record, or you need to own it.
What we do:Scope custom software or automation. See custom software development.
If the right answer is to buy a tool and stop, we will say so.
We roll out in stages so each step is checked by real users before the next one starts.
Agree the outcome, the owner, the systems involved, the data in play, and what is out of scope.
One workflow with a small group of real users and human review on outputs that matter.
Fix exceptions, tighten access, add logging, and write the handoff documents and SOPs.
Add workflows or teams only when the pilot has met the measures you agreed on.
Monitoring and small changes if we host or operate something for you. Priced separately.
Timelines are set in a written scope once we know your systems, access, data, and review turnaround. Focused pilots are often scoped in weeks and wider rollouts take longer. Estimates, not guarantees.
Governance here means a short set of rules people actually follow, not a policy document nobody opens. We help you decide, write down, and set up the following. We do not certify compliance and we do not replace your counsel.
Decide what may and may not go into AI tools: customer records, financials, health or legal material, credentials. Decide what stays out entirely.
Who gets which tools and permissions, least-privilege connections to your systems, and how access ends when people or projects do.
Name the outputs a person must approve before they leave the building, such as customer messages, financial changes, or legal and medical content, and build that checkpoint into the workflow.
Retention, training, and data-location terms differ by provider, plan, and configuration. We read the terms for the plan you actually use, set what can be set, and document the rest. We do not assume any protection is on.
An owner for each workflow, a record of what automated steps did, and a clear way to report and fix mistakes.
Short, role-based guidance so staff know what is allowed and who to ask when something is unclear.
Governance output is operational guidance, not legal advice or a compliance certification. Where regulated data is involved (health, financial, legal), we scope controls together with your counsel or compliance lead. How we handle your data.
Each kind of cost is separate, so you can say yes to one without committing to the others.
Full detail on how pricing works.
Examples of AI and automation delivered for clients, with the context of each engagement. These are not all rollouts of general-purpose assistants.
20+ hours weekly spent manually reviewing legal documents. AI-driven intake, classification, and export to DMS.
Overflowing inbox risked missing critical messages. AI-powered categorization and priority alerts.
18 published engagements with the challenge, solution, and reported results.
View results →Public examples of workflows, integrations, and MCP tooling we have built.
View showcase →Case results are client-reported from our published case studies. We have not had them independently verified, and your results will depend on your starting point, data, and team.
A Claude-specific rollout: access, connectors, playbooks, and training.
A ChatGPT workspace for staff, or the OpenAI API in your workflows.
A company chat interface and AI gateway with the models you choose.
When tools fall short, scope a standalone build.
Start a business wish list. If you would rather talk it through live, the paid $99 consultation is a separate option.